Accessibility Tools

Select your language

Women, Energy Poverty and a Just Energy Transition

Women, Energy Poverty and a Just Energy Transition

By Lidija Živčič and Katjuša Šavc, Focus Association for Sustainable Development 

Energy poverty occurs when a household cannot achieve the minimum level of domestic energy consumption required for satisfying basic needs and for effective participation in society. Energy poverty results from structural inequalities in income distribution and access to quality housing, inadequate energy pricing and vulnerable consumer support policies, and diverse household energy needs and practices. It is a distinct form of material deprivation with an explicit gender dimension and demonstrated impacts on physical and mental health.

Namely, women and women-led households are disproportionately affected by energy poverty, but women are at the same time a strong actor in tackling energy poverty. Due to labour division, women tend to spend more time working at home and thus are more exposed to energy poverty and its consequences. Generally, there is a higher share of women who are at risk of poverty and social exclusion than men. Women are also more heat and cold sensitive than men due to physiology (chronic temperature-related discomfort, heat and associated diseases).

Yet, the current policies and measures in the member states of the European Union (EU) to tackle energy poverty show hardly any recognition of women being disproportionately affected by energy poverty. Also, the EU's policies and measures for a just energy transition are somewhat more appropriate for men than for women. It is assessed that the energy related aspects of the European Green Deal will have disproportionately more positive effects for men than for women affected by energy poverty, especially if we look at its efforts to boost renovation and renewables.

Starting from the gender gap in ownership of housing, it can be assessed that the Renovation Wave Strategy will bring more positive effects for men than for women, as men tend to be the owners of dwellings more often than women. As the Renovation wave will bring benefits mainly to the owners of the dwellings, women are less likely to directly benefit from it than men. Another relevant aspect to look at is the aspect of job creation in the European Green Deal, especially in the sectors of renovation of buildings and renewable sources of energy, which are the closest to the energy poverty issue. Because the sectors of renovation of buildings and renewable sources of energy are traditionally very male dominated, the benefits of job creation will be enjoyed mostly by men and only partially by women. 

Women are still highly underrepresented in all aspects of the energy sector. Before women enter the workforce, they are already underrepresented in decision making in their own homes, and they are underrepresented as students of technical and energy-related studies. Additionally, they are not equally represented in the decision-making process or the leadership of energy sector companies.

If we are to make a just energy transition happen, this might have to be the first challenge to address. Involving more women in the energy sector and giving them a visible role in energy companies is a must. Also involving more women in energy related decision-making processes should be a prerequisite. Opening up decision-making to more participative formats would also be a good step forward in ensuring that more people, especially from marginalised groups take part in the deliberations and contribute to shaping policies that are more suited for women and other disadvantaged groups.

Although the main policies of the EU for a just energy transition are now fully developed (including the key flaws in regard to gender/intersectionality integrated into them), there could still be space for the involvement of women in all their diversity in designing plans for operationalising those policies at the national level. This might still help to fix some of the disparities for women and orient the implementation of the EU's green energy policies towards higher benefits for women and other vulnerable groups.

Prioritising and empowering women, especially the ones affected by energy poverty, in training and jobs related to renovation and renewables efforts of the EU, is a very important step. Hence it should be considered, when operationalising the renovation and renewables' strategies, how women in all their diversity can be given priority. Also, in training and building up skills and qualifications it should be considered carefully where priority can be given to the inclusion of women. The first step would be to know the needs, interests and skills of women in the energy sector and to view women as enablers of change for a just energy transition.

Of course, the only just transition is a transition away from fossil fuels and towards energy efficiency and renewable sources of energy. One key step for a just energy transition is equal involvement of women in all their diversity, as well as other vulnerable groups, in energy communities, be it energy communities for implementing energy efficiency measures or for using renewable sources of energy. Although empowering people to participate in renewable energy communities has great potential for a just energy transition, women and other vulnerable people are still under-represented in renewable energy projects. National policies promote prosumerism (producing and consuming energy at the same time) as a central element of the energy transition, but currently only a small fraction of citizens have their own renewable energy installations. Vulnerable groups are not only unable to benefit from incentives to use renewable energy but also bear a higher burden from rising energy prices.

The added value of involving citizens, especially vulnerable ones, in energy communities is manifold, but the central theme is the sense of ownership that is conveyed through participation in energy communities. Not only does it facilitate the mobilisation of private capital for the energy transition, thereby reducing the existing investment gap, but it also increases the public acceptance of renewable energy projects when citizens are directly involved as partners. Citizen empowerment is also the key to energy-efficient behaviour, which is key to achieving energy and climate goals.

Energy communities are more than just a joint project of people who want to replace one technology with another and switch from dirty to clean energy. They are processes of social transformation that promote not only physical and material decentralisation, but also decentralisation of power, allowing communities to make their own decisions aimed at satisfying their energy rights, taking into account their specific ecological, social, economic and cultural conditions, and promoting the health and quality of life of people and nature as a whole. That is why it is important to ensure that women and other vulnerable groups are involved also in the management and decision-making processes of the energy communities, not only in membership and/or ownership of the energy communities.

The energy transition is an opportunity to promote a model based on democratic citizen participation, de-growth, clean energy production and recognition of the social and reproductive function of energy. A model that promotes a new economy for people and the planet, that values, revalues and redistributes the work of care among society as a whole. In short, a model in which energy poverty has no place. This requires that energy communities also take on the task of eradicating energy poverty through the guarantee of a universal right to energy. In this way, they must move away from social protection measures which, on the one hand, merely reproduce the mercantilist features of the current energy model and, on the other, stigmatise people.

Apart from including women in energy communities, prioritising women in renovation and renewables deployment for people affected by energy poverty is another important step. The inclusion of people affected by energy poverty in the renovation efforts and in the deployment of renewables is already highlighted by some of the EU policies, but no specific focus is put on women. It is advisable to consider how women in all their diversity, affected by energy poverty, can be given priority.

Protecting women against rising rents or other costs due to renovation or deployment of renewables is the next important aspect to consider. It is necessary to work out more detailed plans on how to ensure that the rents and other housing-related costs do not rise as a consequence of renovations so that this burden does not disproportionately affect women.

Finally, raising awareness that women are disproportionately affected by energy poverty, but are at the same time a strong agent to fight against energy poverty is very important. This entails at least the improved collection of gender-disaggregated data in the energy poverty field, engendering energy poverty indicators and an energy poverty definition that takes gender and intersectional aspects into account.

 

Lidija Živčič

Lidija Živčič

Lidija Živčič is a senior expert at Focus Association for Sustainable Development. She covers topics of sustainable development, climate, energy, energy poverty, transport and degrowth. Coordinated H2020 project EmpowerMed (2019-2023) and worked on numerous other European and Slovenian projects. Also experienced in advocacy and policy work and connected to a broad network of experts, decision-makers and campaigners in Slovenia and the EU. After undergraduate studies in economics in Ljubljana, she completed an MSc in Environmental Science and Policy at Central European University in Budapest in 2001. Obtained PhD degree at Biotechnical faculty, University of Ljubljana, in 2012.

Katjuša Šavc

Katjuša Šavc

Katjuša Šavc works at Focus Association for Sustainable Development. She studied European studies at the Faculty of Social Sciences. Her work is focused on European climate and transport policies. Additionally, she has contributed to various projects centred around sustainable mobility in cities. In recent years, she directed her attention to the gender aspects of just transition. Presently, she is actively engaged in the EUWES project, aiming to enhance the participation of women in the energy sector.

Related Articles

NEWSLETTER

Don´t miss any updates!
Image

Select your language

Social Media:

Log in

Climate and Environmental Justice

We have advanced rights-based and gender-transformative transition frameworks through research that centres the lived experiences of women and marginalised communities on the frontlines of extractive energy policies, promoting climate and energy frameworks attentive to the social and care-related impacts of transition pathways. We have developed a clear vision for a gender-just transition, firmly rooted in gender and human rights norms, establishing both the legal basis and the direction for the transformative changes our planet and societies urgently need. In particular, the ‘Guiding Principles for Gender Equality and Human Rights in the Energy Transition’, a collective effort built through online consultations, an in-person workshop and multiple rounds of revision with activists, practitioners and experts from around the world, outline a transformative vision for reshaping global energy systems through a human rights and gender equality lens.

Our work recognises that the climate emergency is both an existential threat and an opportunity to reimagine societies built on social, gender, economic and environmental justice. We ground our advocacy in feminist and intersectional principles, prioritising the agency and perspectives of communities in the Global South who have contributed the least to the climate emergency yet face its most devastating consequences. Central to our approach is the understanding that energy is not merely a commodity but a fundamental human right; essential for dignity, health, education, work and the realisation of countless other rights. We challenge approaches to the energy transition that risk replicating the harmful patterns of fossil fuel extraction and, instead, advocate for transformative policies that ensure human rights and gender equality as central to building climate-resilient societies rooted in dignity, justice and planetary well-being.

What's next?

We will continue to challenge approaches that treat energy transition as merely a technical shift, instead positioning it as an opportunity to reimagine economies and societies rooted in dignity for all, with particular attention to communities in the Global South who have contributed least to the climate emergency yet are most exposed to its worst effects.

We will connect community-level evidence and the lived experiences of those on the frontlines of extractive policies to national reform and global norm-setting, breaking down silos between human rights, gender, and climate movements, and advancing a shared vision that recognises just transitions as not only fundamental to achieving climate-resilient and sustainable societies, but as transformative pathways that advance social and gender equality, redistribute power and resources equitably, and ensure that energy systems serve the public good rather than profit.

We will mainstream rights-based and genderjust transition priorities in key multilateral spaces (particularly, within the Just Transition Work Programme and the to-be-developed Just Transition Mechanism, within the UNFCCC) to guarantee that just transitions are advanced at all levels.

We will also translate our work, through strategic advocacy, into at least two concrete policy wins, whether promoted, adopted, implemented, or scaled, in priority countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Colombia, South Africa, or Kenya), ensuring these policies align with human rights standards, centre gender equality, and reflect the needs and views of affected communities.

We will build momentum for the progressive recognition of the right to sustainable energy to shift dominant narratives away from purely extractive solutions that sideline gendered impacts, community participation, and Global South perspectives.

Economic Justice and Climate Finance

Our work has transformed the global discussion on fiscal policy in a more just, emancipatory and sustainable direction. Our approach has combined both high-level, expert contributions within decisionmaking circles, with bold, impactful work on narrative change with the general public.

We have been instrumental in the inclusion of human rights as a guiding principle of the future United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, a multilateral instrument with the potential of raising approx. USD 492 billion per year in public revenues currently foregone to global tax abuse. In the process leading to the ‘Compromiso de Sevilla’ decided at FfD4, we proposed and succeeded in creating a specific human rights workstream within the Civil Society Financing for Development Mechanism, which was critical to ensure that explicit commitments on the matter were included in the negotiating outcome. In a context of cutbacks in multilateral institutions, we have amplified the capacities of technical experts, providing rigorous technical support and leveraging our influence to ensure the enactments of groundbreaking standard-setting instruments, such as the 2025 UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Statement on Fiscal Policy and Human Rights, and the first ex oficio hearing on the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights on Fiscal and Economic Policies to Address Poverty and Structural Inequality, leading to an upcoming thematic resolution on the matter. We have also bridged the silos between multilateral tax discussions and climate finance debates, promoting ambitious financing commitments to increase international and domestic resource mobilisation during COP 28, 29 and 30.

At the regional level, our engagement with fiscal cooperation platforms such as the Platform for Fiscal Cooperation of Latin America and the Caribbean (PTLAC), where we are member of its Civil Society Consultative Council, and the African Anti-IFFs Policy Tracker, for which we participated in the pilot mission in Ivory Coast together with Tax Justice Network Africa (TJNA), have been critical in cementing a growing engagement between tax administrations and ministries of finance with international legal experts, exploring actionable and transformative initiatives, such as the taxation of high-net-worth individuals, beneficial ownership registries and corporate countryby-country reports, to be implemented at the international level.

At the local level, our interventions in fiscal reform debates in Chile, Brazil, Colombia and Nigeria have contributed to shaping legislative outcomes in a more progressive, rights-compliant direction.

As for our leadership in narrative change, we have a measurable track record in delivering tailored, innovative campaigns which have decisively expanded economic justice constituencies by appealing to a broader tent. In Latin America and the Caribbean, we created the ‘Date Cuenta’ campaign, coordinating over 40 organisations across civil society to deliver plain language, innovative messaging connecting progressive fiscal reforms to the financing of health, education and social protection. ‘Date Cuenta’ generated over 55 original campaign messages that were tailored to the realities of seven priority countries (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru and Honduras) and disseminated in Spanish, Portuguese and English. In doing so, we convened more than 65 online co-creation workshops with partners, coordinating a unified communications strategy which combined digital outreach, press and media coverage, and collaboration with influencers. Ultimately, ‘Date Cuenta’ resulted in more than 60,000 interactions on social media, coverage in major regional and international media outlets, including El País, Deutsche Welle, Bloomberg and France 24, and the participation of at least 63 social media influencers through 58 dedicated publications. In collaboration with Fundación Gabo and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, we also organised a two-day workshop in Bogota with 20 journalists from 13 countries, building a regional network trained in a human rights-based approach to fiscal policy that has since generated published media coverage on outlets such as La Diaria, Ciper, El Diario Ar and Milenio. Through ‘Date Cuenta’ and our regional advocacy, we strengthened civil society engagement in key processes, including the Financing for Development track and FfD4, co-organised highlevel dialogues with states and civil society from Latin America and Africa.

What's next?

We will shape the UN Tax Convention and its Protocols so they embed human rights principles, and we will stay engaged through follow-up processes (including the expected Conference of the Parties) to support effective implementation. We will keep linking tax and climate finance so that new resources mobilised through fiscal cooperation are channelled to adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, in line with UNFCCC commitments.

Public Services for Care Societies

We have translated participatory research into accountability and policy outcomes.

In Ivory Coast, our work with Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains and affected communities since 2023 exposed how privatisation and lack of accountability restrict access to quality healthcare. It contributed to the closure of 1,022 illegal private health centres, an executive instrument strengthening the regulation of private hospitals across the country, and the creation of a permanent complaints management committee in healthcare through a bylaw issued by the prefect of Gagnoa. Partners engaged through this process also advanced concrete improvements at facility level: members of the Gagnoa Midwives Association who took part in the participatory action research pooled resources to renovate the neonatal unit of the Regional Hospital, and the Director of the Gagnoa General Hospital launched an action plan to expand services and improve patient reception, with the facility receiving the award for best hospital in the country in 2025.

In Kenya, our research with the Mathare Education Taskforce documented the absence of public schools and the expansion of private provision, evidencing impacts on households and caregivers and strengthening demands for free, quality public education. This work contributed to stronger community agency and collective organisation, alongside ongoing strategies ranging from communications to litigation to secure a public school in the area, some involving GI-ESCR and others led independently.

Across Africa, this work is complemented by a multi-country study examining the human rights implications of austerity in education and health, including how regressive fiscal policies, rising debt burdens and persistent underinvestment undermine the financing and delivery of public services.

In Latin America, from 29 November to 2 December 2021, over a thousand representatives from over one hundred countries, from grassroots movements, advocacy, human rights, and development organisations, feminist movements, trade unions, and other civil society organisations, met in Santiago, Chile, and virtually, to discuss the critical role of public services for our future. Following the meeting, the Santiago Declaration on Public Services was adopted to demand universal access to quality, gender-transformative and equitable public services as the foundation of a fair and just society.

We are currently advancing work on care systems, linking public services and fiscal justice through integrated research, advocacy and communications, including a regional campaign framing care as a collective responsibility requiring sustained public investment.

What's next?

In Ivory Coast, we will evaluate and strengthen the complaints management committee and position it as a replicable model for other health facilities. In Kenya, we will support the Mathare community to co-design a model public school for Mabatini and Ngei wards, grounded in human rights standards. Building on our multi-country austerity study, we will drive national advocacy on financing for education and health: advancing reforms in Ghana; launching a fiscal policy and public services financing agenda in Kenya through the CESCR process and targeted coalition work; and, in Nigeria, using the new tax acts in force since 1 January 2026 to catalyse a national accountability campaign for adequately funded, quality public services. In Latin America, we will amplify locally led care pilots across 8 countries and turn lessons into influence—advancing care policies that strengthen care organisations, protect care workers’ rights, support unpaid caregivers, include disability and family networks, and redistribute care more equitably.